Menu

Watch The Greatest Showman (2017) Movie Stream

1/29/2017

Check out the latest movie reviews, news & trailers. We have all the hottest and exclusive news on the movies you can't wait to see! Watch Muhammad Ali In His 5 Most Incredible Fights: Full Video, See Search through our designer clothes sale for women and find great savings of up to 50% off. We have over 2000 designers and 140 boutiques to choose from. Some people are fans of the Dallas Cowboys. But many, many more people are NOT fans of the Dallas Cowboys. This 2017 Deadspin NFL team preview is for those in the. Boy Who Claims He Died And Went To Heaven Is Getting His Own Movie By Billy Hallowell The Blaze August 14, 2013. Original Link. Colton Burpo’s story has been told. James Howard Kunstler is the author of many books including (non-fiction) The Geography of Nowhere, The City in Mind: Notes on the Urban Condition, Home from Nowhere.

Nicky Delmonico Makes White Sox Debut. In his sixth year as a pro ballplayer, Nicky Delmonico made his major- league debut with the Chicago White Sox tonight, striking out before a sparse crowd. The futile at- bat did a bit to ease concerns that Delmonico, who plays all four corner positions and can work the count a bit, wouldn’t fit in with the Pale Hose. Delmonico was called up to fill the roster spot left open when outfielder Willy Garc. His opinions are his own.

MSM, Still Living in Propaganda- ville – Consortiumnews. Exclusive: The stakes in U. S.- Russia relations could not be higher – possible nuclear conflagration and the end of civilization – but the U. S. Pack journalism has always been a threat to quality reporting but now it has evolved into a self- sustaining media lifestyle in which the old motto, “there’s safety in numbers,” is borne out by the fact that being horrendously wrong, such as on Iraq’s WMD, leads to almost no accountability because so many important colleagues were wrong as well.

Get the latest News news with exclusive stories and pictures from Rolling Stone. The latest breaking news on Odessa NY and Schuyler County, including sports, business, government, and people, with calendar of events and classified ads. Logan movie reviews & Metacritic score: In the near future, a weary Logan cares for an ailing Professor X in a hideout on the Mexican border. But Logan's att. BibMe Free Bibliography & Citation Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Harvard. Watch Entourage 2 (2015) Movie Online.

Similarly, there has been no accountability after many mainstream journalists and commentators falsely stated as flat- fact that “all 1. U. S. Even the esteemed “Politifact” deemed the assertion “true.” But it was never true. It was at best a needled distortion of a claim by President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper when he issued a statement last Oct. Russian meddling. Because Clapper was the chief of the U.

S. Intelligence Community, his opinion morphed into a claim that it represented the consensus of all 1. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton began touting. Cult Horror Movies Earth One Amazing Day (2017). However, for people who understand how the U. S. Intelligence Community works, the claim of a 1. National Intelligence Estimate (or NIE) that seeks out judgments and dissents from the various agencies. But there was no NIE regarding alleged Russian meddling and there apparently wasn’t even a formal assessment from a subset of the agencies at the time of Clapper’s statement.

President Obama did not order a publishable assessment until December – after the election – and it was not completed until Jan. Clapper’s office presented the opinions of analysts from the Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency – three agencies (or four if you count the DNI’s office), not 1. Lacking Hard Evidence. The report also contained no hard evidence of a Russian “hack” and amounted to a one- sided circumstantial case at best.

However, by then, the U. S. The argument went: “How can anyone question what all 1. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (right) talks with President Barack Obama in the Oval Office, with John Brennan and other national security aides present.

It only involved the FBI, NSA and CIA as well as the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. It wasn’t a full inter- agency community assessment that was coordinated among the 1. After this testimony, some of the major news organizations, which had been waving around the “1. Russian “meddling” as an established fact no longer requiring attribution or referred to the “unanimous judgment” of the Intelligence Community without citing a specific number. This “unanimous judgment” formulation was deceptive, too, because it suggested that all 1. For a regular reader of The New York Times or a frequent viewer of CNN, the distinction would almost assuredly not be detected.

For more than a month after the Clapper- Brennan testimonies, there was no formal correction. A Belated Correction. Finally, on June 2. Times’ hand was forced when White House correspondent Maggie Haberman reverted to the old formulation, mocking Trump for “still refus. The assessment was not approved by all 1. American intelligence community.”The Associated Press ran a similar “clarification” applied to some of its fallacious reporting repeating the “1.

So, you might have thought that the mainstream media was finally adjusting its reporting to conform to reality. But that would mean that one of the pillars of the Russia- gate “scandal” had crumbled, the certainty that Russia and Vladimir Putin did “meddle” in the election. The story would have to go back to square one and the major news organizations would have to begin reporting on whether or not there ever was solid evidence to support what had become a “certainty” – and there appeared to be no stomach for such soul- searching. Since pretty much all the important media figures had made the same error, it would be much easier to simply move on as if nothing had changed. That would mean that skepticism would still be unwelcome and curious leads would not be followed. For instance, there was a head- turning reference in an otherwise typical Washington Post take- out on June 2.

Russia of committing “the crime of the century.”A reference, stuck deep inside the five- page opus, said, “Some of the most critical technical intelligence on Russia came from another country, officials said. Because of the source of the material, the NSA was reluctant to view it with high confidence.”Though the Post did not identify the country, this reference suggests that more than one key element of the case for Russian culpability was based not on direct investigations by the U. S. And why – given the extraordinary expertise of the NSA in computer hacking – is “some of the most critical technical intelligence on Russia .

Anyone who questions this established conventional wisdom is still crazy and out of step. For instance, James Holmes of Esquire was stunned on Thursday when Trump at a news conference in Poland reminded the traveling press corps about the inaccurate reporting regarding the 1. Russia’s guilt.“In public, he’s still casting doubt on the intelligence community’s finding that Russia interfered in the 2. Holmes sputtered before describing Trump’s comment as a “rant.”So, if you thought that a chastened mainstream media might stop in the wake of the “1. Russia- gate business, you would have been sadly mistaken. But the problem is not just the question of whether Russia hacked into Democratic emails and slipped them to Wiki.

Leaks for publication (something that both Russia and Wiki. Leaks deny). Perhaps the larger danger is how the major U. S. John Mc. Cain.

Nuland was heard in an intercepted pre- coup phone call with U. S. Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt discussing who should become the new leaders and pondering how to “glue” or “midwife this thing.”Despite the clear evidence of U. S. Trump simply cannot fail to admonish Mr. Putin for Russia’s attempts to meddle in the 2. He must make clear the United States will not tolerate it, period.

Naturally, this is a difficult issue for Mr. Trump, who reaped the benefit of Russia’s intervention and now faces a special counsel’s investigation, but nonetheless, in his first session with Mr. Putin, the president must not hesitate to be blunt. Trump must also display determination. Russia fomented an armed uprising and seized Crimea in violation of international norms, and it continues to instigate violence in the Donbas. Trump ought to make it unmistakably clear to Mr.

Putin that the United States will not retreat from the sanctions imposed over Ukraine until the conditions of peace agreements are met.”Along the same lines, even while suggesting the value of some collaboration with Russia toward ending the war in Syria, Post columnist David Ignatius wrote in a July 5 column, “Russian- American cooperation on Syria faces a huge obstacle right now. It would legitimize a Russian regime that invaded Ukraine and meddled in U. S. There is no doubt that Russia “invaded” Ukraine; “seized” Crimea; “meddled” in U. S. Yet all these groupthinks should be subjected to skepticism, not simply treated as undeniable truths. But seeing only one side to a story is where the U.

S. Yes, it is possible that Russia was responsible for the Democratic hacks and did funnel the material to Wiki. Leaks, but evidence has so far been lacking. And, instead of presenting both sides fairly, the major media acts as if only one side deserves any respect and dissenting views must be ridiculed and condemned. In this perverted process, collectively approved versions of complex situations congeal into conventional wisdom, which simply cannot be significantly reconsidered regardless of future revelations. As offensive as this rejection of true truth- seeking may be, it also represents an extraordinary danger when mixed with the existential risk of nuclear conflagration.